Paterson backs UK GM crops
Paterson said GM crops, which are currently only produced small-scale and not available commercially, would have 'real environmental benefits' and dismissed criticism as 'nonsense'.
Supporters argue GM would increase yields and reduce pesticide usage.
"The trouble is all this stuff about Frankenstein foods and putting poisons in foods. There are real benefits, and what you've got to do is sell the real environmental benefits" the Environment secretary said in an interview with The Daily Telegraph.
The comments follow a meeting held in June by the GM industry's Agricultural Biotechnology Council (ABC) which was attended by ministers and government officials.
Critics of GM have said Paterson's statements were 'factually inaccurate and ignores the UK Government's own data from feed trials that showed GM crops harm wildlife'.
"Mr Paterson seems to be formulating policy from an evidence base provided by the agri-biotech industry and ignoring the Government’s own data showing GM harms wildlife" said Pete Riley of GM Freeze.
"He needs to consult more widely with people who understand the evidence."
Critics have highlighted the problems of herbicide intolerance, superbugs and wildlife threats. Those against the introduction of GM production say pesticide use in the US is higher than before GM.
But Paterson dismissed the criticisms. He said GM crops were already being used worldwide on a large scale and people were already eating GM food unwittingly.
"I'm very clear it would be a good thing," he said.
"So you'd discuss it within government, you'd discuss it at a European level and you'd need to persuade the public."
Currently, the government is looking into new measures to push farming technologies forward in the UK and that David Cameron would support GM at the "appropriate moment".
"What we farmers need is a food production system that provides safe healthy food that our customers want to buy, provides the farmer with a decent return on time and investment and delivers genuine environmental and social benefits in the countryside" said Lincolnshire farmer Pete Lundgren.
But Professor Anne Glover said Europe could only achieve sustainable intensification if we become more 'open-minded.'
"What we do now will shape what happens in 2050," said Professor Glover.
"We do need to improve crop yields and we need to improve wastage before harvest. Farming needs to have less chemical and water input. This has to be achievable and we will achieve it, but we need to be more open minded about how we achieve it."
Professor Glover referred specifically to European attitudes towards GM technology.
"If we just looked at the evidence base, we would have GM in the EU without a doubt. GM crops are subject to more scrutiny than any other type of agriculture," she said, adding: "There is no substantiated evidence that I have ever seen that GM crops are harmful to the environment, animals or people".
But Pete Riley commented: "Millions of people go hungry because they cannot afford to buy food while millions of others are sick and obese because they are not able to afford a healthy diet. GM crops do nothing to address these fundamental problems."
Does anyone else notice the way in which the message is being repeated, repeated, repeated in the hope that we all believe it? It doesn't change the truth of the matter. This very good short film featuring American farmers who've come the wrong side of the so-called GM wonder crops is well worth watching. You won't see this quoted in the corporate handouts! http://vimeo.com/18994807
Look at Prof Glover urging on sustainable intensification, a snazzy buzzword that so many, including the NFU, have become addicted to.
What chance that Paterson and his ilk will actually look at what consumers want? Will he offer them all the information they need to make an informed choice? When he says "GM crops were already being used worldwide on a large scale and people were already eating GM food unwittingly", surely he sees therefore the consumers have been conned? Surely he ought by his own inference to therefore be insisting that food be labelled correctly to give consumers a proper and informed choice? No doubt he'll fall for the American line, that they think that there's no discernible difference between the genetically manipulated and the plant that nature provides. At least, that's what the GM companies have led the American government to believe, and persuaded them to accept. Thus, virtually nothing has ever been tested independently, for any length of time, or properly. Are we really ready to swallow that?
So the claim that GMO's are safe to eat is deeply flawed. There is no proof of safety regarding human consumption of GMO's. Its all corporate propaganda designed to secure total control over the entire global food supply through patents and the WTO.
The only safe and reliable way of feeding a growing population at a time when the climate is rapidly changing and land fertility is falling is to revert to permaculture techniques. Follow this link:
Check out the 'How to survive the coming crisis' video linked to on the right hand side of the page.
We don't need GMO's to feed the world. We need locally grown open pollinating crops and less chemical toxins not mono culture/chemical warfare both on the land and in our kitchens.
Owen Paterson is barking up the wrong tree.
We do not want to be part of an experiment by multinational giants telling us there is no alternative and feeding the line very convincintgly to government ministers.
Conventional breeding of crops is showing inreasing yields year after year. That technology is safe and has stood the test of time. Put some money into that instead of falling for the beguiling words of a smart salesman.
Please enter your name
Please enter your comment
Your comment submitted successfully.Please wait for admin approval.
Some error on your process.Please try one more time.
GM crops are good for the economy and can reduce the amount of pesticides u...
Demand from smaller European markets has helped drive strong growth for UK ...
A lack of engineers, not enough people promoting the land-based industries ...
Environment Secretary Elizabeth Truss is launching the National Pollinator ...
Agricultural specialists have welcomed a potential financial boost for youn...
As retailers continue to participate in a highly competitive race to the bo...
New farm business income data from Defra, which focus on income from March ...
Agriculture has remained one of the industries in which workers are most li...
Prime arable land in the UK has seen a substantial year-on-year growth in p...