24-07-2014 11:32 AM | News, Veterinary News

BVA will support second year of badger cull pilots in England



The British Veterinary Association (BVA) supports the second year of the pilot culls in England. This follows Defra’s response to BVA’s call for improvements to humaneness and effectiveness in light of the Independent Expert Panel (IEP) report on the first year.

The IEP report, published in April, found that the first year of culling failed to meet criteria for effectiveness (in terms of the number of badgers removed) and that the method of controlled shooting had failed to meet the criteria for humaneness. BVA welcomed the report and called on Defra to implement all of the IEP’s recommendations fully.

BVA has remained in constant dialogue with Defra and met with the then Secretary of State Owen Paterson, the Chief Veterinary Officer Nigel Gibbens, and other Defra officials to seek clarification on Defra’s proposals, as well as calling for robust monitoring and collation of results and independent analysis and audit by a non-governmental body.

Defra has moved considerably, confirming a number of changes to its plans. In particular, Defra has confirmed that:


- shotguns would not be used for controlled shooting;

- contractor selection, training and assessment would be enhanced;

- the number of field observations of shooting and number of post mortem examinations of badgers would be in line with that carried out in year one; and

- real-time information would ensure a better distribution of effort and that poor performing marksmen would be removed from the field.

In addition, and in response to BVA, Defra has committed to an independent audit of the way the protocols are carried out during the cull. BVA is satisfied that the appointment of such an auditor addresses many of our original concerns. However, BVA will continue to call upon the new Secretary of State to put in place independent analysis in order to give confidence to the wider public.

BVA’s position on any further rollout of controlled shooting as a method to cull badgers (and its continued use in the pilots) will be decided once we have assessed the outcomes of the second year.

Commenting, BVA President Robin Hargreaves said:

“BVA has always maintained that we could only support the use of controlled shooting as a method to cull badgers if it was found to be humane, effective and safe. We supported the findings of the Independent Expert Panel and called on Defra to implement the recommendations fully.

“We therefore welcome Defra’s proposals to improve humaneness and effectiveness in light of the IEP report, and we have been pleased how far Defra has moved towards BVA’s position, in particular by ensuring a robust and independent audit is in place.

“It is essential that Defra gets this right to allow the veterinary profession to have confidence that controlled shooting can be carried out humanely and effectively. We continue to call upon the Secretary of State to put in place independent analysis of the second year of culling to give confidence to the wider public.

“Badger culling is a necessary part of a comprehensive bovine TB eradication strategy that also includes strict cattle measures and vaccination. Culling remains a hugely emotive issue but we must tackle the disease in both cattle and wildlife. Scientific evidence supports the use of targeted, humane badger culling to achieve a reduction in the disease in cattle.

“I’m proud that the veterinary profession has had such a significant influence on Defra’s position and we will continue to engage with the government to ensure the pilot culls are humane and effective.”

Comments

24-07-2014 12:21 PM | Posted by Roger Broad
I would like to see the evidence to support targeted humane killing of Badgers as any method of achieving a reduction of BTB in Cattle. When Wales has achieved that reduction without killing Badgers. And Warwick University reports from research the minimal role of Badgers. But the significant Cattle to cattle spread from the ineffective Cattle test. And lack of Cattle Vaccination programme. It is clear that at this point DEFRA will indicate its super new shooting skills.An talk about Independent monitoring . But hopefully not as independent as Natural England . LOL And how many Badgers will test positive for BTB. if again last years Post Mortem detail is carried out once more.Politics, smoke and mirrors once more.
24-07-2014 12:41 PM | Posted by Clued-Up
The question of who monitors / audits the badger cull is extremely important. Whether the contractors and shooters abide by the conditions they've agreed to depends on both the quality of the monitoring / auditing process and whether the supervising body instantly stops further participation in the cull by any individual or organisation in breach of the conditions.

The IEP Report showed clearly that Natural England FAILED COMPLETELY to uphold its licencing conditions. The shooters ignored NE requirements on where to shoot the badgers; there was fraud (eg the deep-frozen badger submitted as a freshly shot animal); essential documentation to control the project wasn't completed by the shooters; unauthorised, untrained shooters took part in the cull; and shooters resisted monitoring by the official monitors. Natural England proved itself to be a totally unfit body to manage the cullers.

Further IEP input, strengthened sufficiently to stop future breaches of licencing conditions, is the best guarantee of acceptable behaviour by the cullers.
24-07-2014 17:33 PM | Posted by reg pollard
these vets want to make up their minds,the badger cull is either humane or it isn't,and it has been proved beyond any doubt that it is not,as far as skilled marksmen are concerned if they can hit a barn door from 2 feet with a shot gun they are in natural England and deathras opinion marksmen.
25-07-2014 13:54 PM | Posted by R Mount
Assuming that badgers need to be culled, why are we choosing to shoot them (which naturally has to be done at night)?
Surely a more humane and effective method would be to use lethal doses of anaesthetic gas whilst all the badgers are holed up in their setts during the day?
Whilst trying to pander to all interested parties, we seem to have arrived at a singularly unsatisfactory and ineffective culling method. Either do a proper job or don't bother at all.
25-07-2014 23:52 PM | Posted by Nigel
I will be contacting my vet on Monday to ask if they are members of the BVA - if they are I will take my business elsewhere. I urge every other moral consumer to use their buying power to oppose this inhumane, unscientific and unnecessary slaughter of our wildlife.
26-07-2014 17:22 PM | Posted by reg pollard
Nice one Nigel,i will be doing the same thing,hitting them in the pocket is where it hurts,i would also ask people to boycott dairy products and British beef i have been boycotting them since last year,talking to a vet this week who is against the cull he said Bva have to make it look like they support farmers,all about money,so well done Nigel,boycott boycott boycott!
26-07-2014 17:32 PM | Posted by reg pollard
Badger friends' we talk about boycotting,what about Nfu mutual insurance etc.,cancel All products immediately hit them where it hurts,boycott all businesses that support the badger cull.
27-07-2014 09:10 AM | Posted by Clued-Up
Email sent last week to BVA: "I was pleased to see the BVA has achieved some important changes in principle as regards the 2nd year of the badger cull (eg no use of shotguns). I’m concerned about two matters in particular, however, and would appreciate receiving answers on both from BVA.

The first issue is that the Warwick model provides strong proof that a combination of cattle measures alone will defeat bTB in cattle (and that nothing else will). The researchers have worked with what badger information is available (lumped under the general heading of environmental challenge) and they conclude – even more strongly than previous researchers – that killing badgers doesn’t reduce cattle bTB. How can BVA support the local destruction of populations of legally protected, much valued wild animals knowing their slaughter won’t achieve its alleged aims?

Has BVA talked to the researchers producing the Warwick model please? If the quality of the data linking badgers to cattle bTB is as poor as they say it is, then that data has not been good enough to support any of the badger killing done over the last 20 years, let alone to justify the 2nd year of the cull.

The BVA should have enough skilled scientists amongst their membership to talk productively with the researchers who analysed the many years of data used to create the Warwick model. I’d suggest the right way forward is for the BVA’s management board to ask for a report back from those veterinary scientists concerning whether recent research entirely removes any justification for killing badgers as a cattle bTB control measure. In Tudor times, it was a legal requirement to beat cattle unmercifully on their way to market in order to tenderise the meat; the quality of thinking supporting the badger cull seems to be similarly irrational and unethical.

The second issue relates to independent oversight of the badger cull. It’s only thanks to the IEP Report we found out that the shooters and culling companies flouted many of the licencing conditions they had agreed to, also that Natural England completely failed to uphold the licencing conditions they’d set. As the shooters and culling companies paid so little heed to their obligations when they knew they’d be subject to IEP oversight, exactly what independent oversight arrangements is BVA insisting on to ensure the 2nd cull is more humane, effective and safe? I struggle to think of any organisation except last year’s IEP that would have any public credibility as a provider of oversight for the badger cull.

The government suggests Natural England could perform this oversight role, however the IEP report showed the culling companies and shooters ignored the commitments they’d given to Natural England and Natural England took no action against them.

I look forward to hearing BVA’s responses to the issues I’ve raised."
27-07-2014 15:23 PM | Posted by reg pollard
has anyone any idea of how many badgers will be killed in the culls this year or is it going to be 70% of badgers population in these areas and if so do any of these clever politicians or so called experts have any idea of what figure 70% will be and what about all the healthy badgers that will be killed, which will well out number infected badgers,suppose that doesn't matter if you are a farmer or land owner or politician and how long will culling last this year, 6 weeks or 3months like last fiasco,badger friends just remember these culls come May 2015.

Post Comment

Display Name
Your Email
(optional)
Your Comments