Agri-Shop Ltd
Farminguk
03 May 2016 | Online since 2003
Briefing Media - FG Classified


21 March 2014 15:44:48|Cattle,Finance,News

Beef prices - Time for review of abattoir charges?


Concerns over inconsistent and unnecessary charges levied on farmers sending cattle to slaughter were voiced at the recent Anglesey NFU Cymru meeting.
NFU Cymru County Chair, Christine Jones said, “One of the biggest areas of contention is the deductions to deal with Specified Risk Material (SRM) from carcasses which vary widely at plants around the country and do not seem to have fallen with the relaxation in BSE sampling rules. Farmers are now calling on abattoirs to show more transparency over their charging policies particularly around SRM disposal.
“The evidence we have seen is that the charges levied by plants across the industry are inconsistent. With charges between sites for what are essentially the same operations varying so much, it does beg the question of whether some of these charges can really be justified. We would like to see abattoirs review their charges to ensure they are fair and transparent and that farmers are made fully aware of exactly what and why charges are being imposed on their cattle being presented for slaughter.
“In our opinion it is nonsensical that the rule appertaining to the removal of the vertebral column continues to apply to cattle over 30 months of age. Consumer safety and public health are paramount to us and it was right that robust controls were put in place in the mid-90s when BSE was rife but it is now time to move forward on the basis of sound scientific evidence. The current regulation is resulting in a two tier market for prime beef and we are calling on the European Commission to amend this rule in line with the reduced disease risk.”
Mrs Jones concluded, “NFU Cymru would wish to see harmonisation of BSE testing with Vertebral Column (VC) removal in bovines. Currently the VC is classed as SRM in cattle aged over 30 months but if the science suggests that it poses minimal threat to human health, we believe this is an example of an added cost to the livestock industry with no benefit to consumer protection.”

Download





0 Comment


Name

Please enter your name


Email

Comment

Please enter your comment


Post Comment

Your comment submitted successfully.Please wait for admin approval.


Comments

No comments posted yet. Be the first to post a comment

World News

USA | 3 May 2016
US cattle futures recover from 4-month lows

U.S. cattle futures rebounded from four-month lows Monday, lifted by hopes that a steep drop in beef prices will spark fresh demand for discounted steaks and burgers. June live-cattle futures rose ...


Canada | 3 May 2016
Ottawa to talk compensation with dairy farmers for Canada-EU trade deal

The federal government will meet Canadian dairy farmers within 30 days to discuss a compensation package designed to ease any pain caused by Canada signing the Canada-European Union trade deal. "An...


USA | 3 May 2016
Where's the beef? You won't be able to find out if agricultural groups their way

Beef, egg, and milk producers behind campaigns like “Got Milk” want to be exempt from FOIA requests. A number of prominent agricultural commodity groups have successfully pushed for language to be ...


Ireland | 3 May 2016
Department under fire on €20m cattle tagging contract

Serious questions have been raised over the tender process for the €20m national cattle tag contract. The three year contract is up for grabs again this year, but suppliers believe that the proces...


Australia | 3 May 2016
Chinese group drops $281m bid for Australian cattle firm

A Chinese-led group dropped its A$371 million ($281 million) offer for Australia’s most iconic cattle ranch after opposition from the government weeks before a general election. The suitors led by ...



Trending Now

Viewed
Discussed

Farms and Land for sale


Holiday Rentals search



Top stories you may have missed
Username
Password