10 February 2016 | Online since 2003

Beef prices Time for review of abattoir charges



21 March 2014 15:44:48|Cattle,Finance,News

Beef prices - Time for review of abattoir charges?


Concerns over inconsistent and unnecessary charges levied on farmers sending cattle to slaughter were voiced at the recent Anglesey NFU Cymru meeting.
NFU Cymru County Chair, Christine Jones said, “One of the biggest areas of contention is the deductions to deal with Specified Risk Material (SRM) from carcasses which vary widely at plants around the country and do not seem to have fallen with the relaxation in BSE sampling rules. Farmers are now calling on abattoirs to show more transparency over their charging policies particularly around SRM disposal.
“The evidence we have seen is that the charges levied by plants across the industry are inconsistent. With charges between sites for what are essentially the same operations varying so much, it does beg the question of whether some of these charges can really be justified. We would like to see abattoirs review their charges to ensure they are fair and transparent and that farmers are made fully aware of exactly what and why charges are being imposed on their cattle being presented for slaughter.
“In our opinion it is nonsensical that the rule appertaining to the removal of the vertebral column continues to apply to cattle over 30 months of age. Consumer safety and public health are paramount to us and it was right that robust controls were put in place in the mid-90s when BSE was rife but it is now time to move forward on the basis of sound scientific evidence. The current regulation is resulting in a two tier market for prime beef and we are calling on the European Commission to amend this rule in line with the reduced disease risk.”
Mrs Jones concluded, “NFU Cymru would wish to see harmonisation of BSE testing with Vertebral Column (VC) removal in bovines. Currently the VC is classed as SRM in cattle aged over 30 months but if the science suggests that it poses minimal threat to human health, we believe this is an example of an added cost to the livestock industry with no benefit to consumer protection.”

Download





0 Comment


Name

Please enter your name


Email

Comment

Please enter your comment


Post Comment

Your comment submitted successfully.Please wait for admin approval.


Comments

No comments posted yet. Be the first to post a comment

World News

India | 10 February 2016
Smallest Indian wheat crop in six years to spur imports

India may harvest its smallest wheat crop in six years after two successive years of below-average monsoon rainfall stresses crops, potentially opening its doors to more imports. Production is set ...


Ireland | 10 February 2016
Another volatile year ahead for farmers

Northern Ireland's agri-food sector was another volatile year ahead, Danske Bank has said. The institution held its annual Agri Economic Outlook Breakfast yesterday and heard about "multiple threat...


USA | 10 February 2016
California farmers reap record sales in record drought

A new state report shows California farmers reaping record sales despite the epic drought, thriving even as city-dwellers have been forced to conserve water, household wells have run dry and fish have...


Ireland | 10 February 2016
Dairy farmers: Don't use the milk price as an excuse to compromise on herd welfare

Spring calving season is now in full flight on the majority of dairy farms. In excess of one million calves will be born on Irish dairy farms between February and April. Great strides have been mad...


USA | 10 February 2016
Rise In cattle numbers driving down beef prices

Matt Stockton, an ag economist for UNL's West Central Research and Extension Center says the rising number of cattle is driving down price. "When prices are first recognized and start going up the ...



Trending Now

Viewed
Discussed

Farms and Land for sale


Holiday Rentals search



Top stories you may have missed
Username
Password