HROC (agency) - Kubota
Farminguk
28 July 2016 | Online since 2003
OvoConcept


21 March 2014 15:44:48|Cattle,Finance,News

Beef prices - Time for review of abattoir charges?


Concerns over inconsistent and unnecessary charges levied on farmers sending cattle to slaughter were voiced at the recent Anglesey NFU Cymru meeting.
NFU Cymru County Chair, Christine Jones said, “One of the biggest areas of contention is the deductions to deal with Specified Risk Material (SRM) from carcasses which vary widely at plants around the country and do not seem to have fallen with the relaxation in BSE sampling rules. Farmers are now calling on abattoirs to show more transparency over their charging policies particularly around SRM disposal.
“The evidence we have seen is that the charges levied by plants across the industry are inconsistent. With charges between sites for what are essentially the same operations varying so much, it does beg the question of whether some of these charges can really be justified. We would like to see abattoirs review their charges to ensure they are fair and transparent and that farmers are made fully aware of exactly what and why charges are being imposed on their cattle being presented for slaughter.
“In our opinion it is nonsensical that the rule appertaining to the removal of the vertebral column continues to apply to cattle over 30 months of age. Consumer safety and public health are paramount to us and it was right that robust controls were put in place in the mid-90s when BSE was rife but it is now time to move forward on the basis of sound scientific evidence. The current regulation is resulting in a two tier market for prime beef and we are calling on the European Commission to amend this rule in line with the reduced disease risk.”
Mrs Jones concluded, “NFU Cymru would wish to see harmonisation of BSE testing with Vertebral Column (VC) removal in bovines. Currently the VC is classed as SRM in cattle aged over 30 months but if the science suggests that it poses minimal threat to human health, we believe this is an example of an added cost to the livestock industry with no benefit to consumer protection.”

Download

0 Comment

loginuserlogo
Name

Please enter your name


Email

Comment

Please enter your comment


Post Comment

Your comment submitted successfully.Please wait for admin approval.


Comments

No comments posted yet. Be the first to post a comment


Russian Federation | 28 July 2016
Sanctions were not discussed directly with German agriculture minister - Russian minister

Lifting of sanctions and counter measures was not discussed directly during the meeting with German Minister of Food and Agriculture Christian Schmidt, Russian Economic Development Minister Akexey Uly...


India | 28 July 2016
India's farmers seize offer of free registration of land sold on 'plain paper'

When the Indian state of Telangana announced a three-week window for free registration of land that had exchanged hands via handwritten notes on plain paper, the offer triggered more than a million ap...


France | 28 July 2016
France to support grain farmers after crops hit by weather

France will help grain farmers cope with an expected plunge in revenue after torrential rain and a lack of sunshine in late spring hit the country's cereal crops. First results of the still ongoing...


Australia | 28 July 2016
Triple target to transform agricultural education in Australia

The United States' framework for agricultural education is inspiring Australian educators to call for a transformation in schools. The 2015-16 winners of the prestigious Hardie Fellowship, Andrew H...


China | 28 July 2016
Chinese company majority investor in $200m Southland dairy plant

A state-owned Chinese company is investing in a Southland company to build a $200 million dairy processing plant with the promise of creating 100 new jobs. Mataura Valley Milk has announced China A...



Trending Now

Viewed
Discussed


Top stories you may have missed
closeicon
Username
Password