Chief Scientist to present crop genetics report to EU
The Planting the Future report, compiled by the European Academies Science Advisory Council (EASAC), will be presented to the EU by the UK member of the EASAC working group Professor Ian Crute, Chief Scientist at the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB).
Describing the potential benefits of crop genetic improvement technologies as ‘very significant’, the report will point to the prospects for improving agricultural productivity and efficiency, environmental quality and human health. It will recommend that capturing these benefits in agricultural innovation should be a matter for the urgent attention of EU policy-makers.
The report will call for a change in Europe’s regulatory framework, for it to emphasise the trait and product more than the technology, taking account of the extensive experience and good practice gained in regulating genetically modified (GM) crops outside the EU. Greater commitment must be given to assessing the benefits, rather than focusing chiefly on potential risk and uncertainty.
“The European Commission needs to take a lead in discussions with Member States to reaffirm the cardinal principle that regulatory decisions and their implementation must be based on science,” Professor Crute will quote from the report.
“The production of more food, more sustainably, requires the development of crops that can make better use of limited resources,” he will add.
“Agricultural innovation can capitalise on the rapid pace of advance in functional genomics research and it is unwise to exclude any technology for ideological reasons. Sustainable agricultural production and food security must harness the potential of biotechnology in all its facets.”
The report will stress the EU is falling behind new international competitors in agricultural innovation and this has implications for EU goals for science and innovation and the environment as well as for agriculture.
In a speech given at Rothamsted Research, last week, Defra Secretary Owen Paterson outlined the case for GM crops, saying: “We must find a way to allow fair market access for products which have undergone a rigorous case by case safety assessment.”
No comments posted yet. Be the first to post a comment
Please enter your name
Please enter your comment
Your comment submitted successfully.Please wait for admin approval.
Some error on your process.Please try one more time.
GM crops are good for the economy and can reduce the amount of pesticides u...
Demand from smaller European markets has helped drive strong growth for UK ...
A lack of engineers, not enough people promoting the land-based industries ...
Environment Secretary Elizabeth Truss is launching the National Pollinator ...
Agricultural specialists have welcomed a potential financial boost for youn...
As retailers continue to participate in a highly competitive race to the bo...
New farm business income data from Defra, which focus on income from March ...
Agriculture has remained one of the industries in which workers are most li...
Prime arable land in the UK has seen a substantial year-on-year growth in p...