Saturday 04 February 2012
Headlines
Did you find this story interesting? (0) (0)
11/09/2009 20:04:25
Evidence on pesticides does not support ban to protect bees
The NFU has today called for an independent and comprehensive assessment of the impact of neonicotinoids after Buglife issued a report implicating these insecticides in the decline of our honey bees.
The report, backed by the Soil Association and the Pesticide Action Network UK, reappraises a selection of existing evidence and recommends a precautionary suspension on the use of all neonicotinoid products pending a review of this group of insecticides.
However, the NFU remains fundamentally opposed to this approach which is not based on clear and sound scientific evidence.
NFU horticulture adviser, and lead on bees, Dr Chris Hartfield said: "Buglife’s call for a suspension on the use of neonicotinoids is not backed by any of the key beekeeping organisations in the UK. Although the report adds a useful perspective to the debate the fact of the matter remains there is still no clear evidence that the use of crop protection products containing neonicotinoids is a factor causing the worrying honey bee losses we are experiencing across the UK.
"All pesticides undergo a very rigorous approval process based on sound science and we would expect sound scientific arguments to be presented before the withdrawal of any product was considered.
"What the debate really needs is an independent and comprehensive assessment of the situation to inform the process. The debate around bees and pesticides can only be resolved by sound science and clear evidence and for this an independent study is needed. To tackle bee health problems effectively we believe we need to work on the basis of what we know, not what we suspect."
The NFU is working closely with beekeepers and the Government to ensure action is taken to provide effective solutions to bee health problems in the UK. All of the key bee-keeping organisations in the UK agree that pests and disease are the principal threat facing British honey bees.
John Howat, bee farmer and secretary of the Bee Farmers’ Association of the UK, said: "The fact is that the parasitic mite Varroa is a major pest killing honey bee colonies, and our controls for it are failing. Why do we need to divert our attention from this danger? The reduced resistance of the honeybee caused by Varroa infection makes them more susceptible to other problems such as viruses, bacterial diseases, and possibly crop protection chemicals. But for the BFA the evidence is far from clear.
"Until there has been a thorough and unbiased review of all the evidence, which takes account of the quality of the evidence and the relevance of it to honey bees in the field, we are not prepared to call for any ban."
Mr Howat also raises concerns about what alternative products would be used if neonicotinoids were banned. As a relatively new product it is likely they would be replaced by older chemistry that could be of greater risk to bees.
The report, backed by the Soil Association and the Pesticide Action Network UK, reappraises a selection of existing evidence and recommends a precautionary suspension on the use of all neonicotinoid products pending a review of this group of insecticides.
However, the NFU remains fundamentally opposed to this approach which is not based on clear and sound scientific evidence.
NFU horticulture adviser, and lead on bees, Dr Chris Hartfield said: "Buglife’s call for a suspension on the use of neonicotinoids is not backed by any of the key beekeeping organisations in the UK. Although the report adds a useful perspective to the debate the fact of the matter remains there is still no clear evidence that the use of crop protection products containing neonicotinoids is a factor causing the worrying honey bee losses we are experiencing across the UK.
"All pesticides undergo a very rigorous approval process based on sound science and we would expect sound scientific arguments to be presented before the withdrawal of any product was considered.
"What the debate really needs is an independent and comprehensive assessment of the situation to inform the process. The debate around bees and pesticides can only be resolved by sound science and clear evidence and for this an independent study is needed. To tackle bee health problems effectively we believe we need to work on the basis of what we know, not what we suspect."
The NFU is working closely with beekeepers and the Government to ensure action is taken to provide effective solutions to bee health problems in the UK. All of the key bee-keeping organisations in the UK agree that pests and disease are the principal threat facing British honey bees.
John Howat, bee farmer and secretary of the Bee Farmers’ Association of the UK, said: "The fact is that the parasitic mite Varroa is a major pest killing honey bee colonies, and our controls for it are failing. Why do we need to divert our attention from this danger? The reduced resistance of the honeybee caused by Varroa infection makes them more susceptible to other problems such as viruses, bacterial diseases, and possibly crop protection chemicals. But for the BFA the evidence is far from clear.
"Until there has been a thorough and unbiased review of all the evidence, which takes account of the quality of the evidence and the relevance of it to honey bees in the field, we are not prepared to call for any ban."
Mr Howat also raises concerns about what alternative products would be used if neonicotinoids were banned. As a relatively new product it is likely they would be replaced by older chemistry that could be of greater risk to bees.
No Comments
Nobody has posted any comments on this story.
|
Farming items for Sale
|
Case IH 895 - Chippenham(GBP 9540)
FORD 655C - Tiverton(GBP 5950)
Case Quadtrac STX 375 - York(GBP 51950)
New Holland TN85FA BLUE CAB - Maidstone(GBP 18900)
2009 - Valtra - N101, Hi-Tech - Ballyclare
(Price on Application)
(Price on Application)
Related News
Banning insecticides will not save British bees - 02 Feb 2009Prohibiting suppliers of its own-brand fresh produce from using neonicotinoid insecticides until they are shown to be safe to honeybees is part of the...
DEFRA offers support to National Bee Unit for bee health research - 21 Jan 2009The £4.3 million increase in funding for research into bee health announced by Defra is a step in the right direction and recognition of the sustained...
Protecting bee health vital to UK farming economy - 20 Jan 2011The Crop Protection Association is highlighting the regulatory controls in place, as well as the stewardship advice available to farmers and sprayer o...
No evidence to support 'Organic is best' says SCI - 08 Aug 2008New research in the latest issue of the Society of Chemical Industry's (SCI) Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture shows there is no evid...
Scientific evidence supports FUW position on TB compensation - 14 Apr 2009The current bovine Tuberculosis (TB) valuation and compensation systems are an integral part of Welsh TB controls and should be retained but irrespons...
New Zealand-Bankers not doing enough for farmers. - 27 Apr 2009NEW ZEALAND-BANKERS NEED TO HELP FARMERS. It’s time bankers got up close and personal again with the dairy farmers they have &...
Pesticide Policy has to change to protect public health - 17 Sep 2003A prominent pesticide campaigner today asks the Government to explain why they launched a Consultation on crop-spraying with the claim that there is n...
Soil Association shock at Government support of withdrawn pesticide - 28 Aug 2009The UK Government is considering reinstating a pesticide, aminopyralid, which has caused huge amounts of damage to fruit and vegetable crops, and whic...
Ban on Calif. Pesticide Spraying Lifted - 20 Oct 2007SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - The spraying of a pesticide to fight a crop-eating moth can resume after a judge said Friday he was satisfied with a government p...
Pesticide ban will raise prices - 01 Nov 2008The National Farmers Union says that a proposed EU ban on pesticides could lead to the price of British fruit and vegetables doubling or even trebling...
