Saturday 04 February 2012
Headlines
Did you find this story interesting? (0) (0)
12/11/2009 08:38:02
Landowners should not be complacent with telecoms mast upgrades
There was between 10 and 5 years ago a drive by mobile ’phone companies to expand the coverage of their networks. This was in response to government directives to give broader coverage as well as the simple commercial desire to allow more calls. This led to a lot of land owners being approached to have equipment placed on their land. Rents were increasing and very attractive to the agricultural sector in particular.
Mobile phone companies have in recent times largely stopped looking for new sites as they face greater competition between themselves and as the recession hits us all. What they are doing is consolidating their relations with each other and they are increasingly sharing each others’ capacities to cut costs.
They are however looking to put in enhanced equipment to service mobile broadband use, especially where they have decided to share sites to cut costs.
What this means for the landowner is that instead of a new site with disturbance payment and a solid rent, there is just a visit from a technical crew to add to or adjust equipment that is already in place.
The landowner should not however be complacent.
The original agreement will usually contain a number of limitations on the equipment that can be installed at any one time.
The limitations can affect the following matters:
1. The height of the mast
2. The maximum number of the antennae
3. The maximum number and the size of the microwave dishes
4. The particular mobile ’phone company using the equipment
If the operator has exceeded the limits in the original agreement it should renegotiate and pay a further fee or increase the rent.
The operator itself will probably have the original lease or agreement in storage and the technical department making any upgrade may not itself have all the details of what was originally agreed. They may go in and make changes that are not authorised in all good faith.
The consequence of this is that it is down to you the landowner to inspect, check and police the operation here.
It is a simple and cheap exercise to get your solicitor or even better a solicitor specialising in this area to set out the details. He or she would at the same time cheque that rent reviews have been properly carried out and that there are no other moneys owing to you. You would be surprised how many agreements are still at the original rent a decade after the original agreement was made.
Do this simple housekeeping exercise now and you could find a surprising bonus at no cost!
Mark McDonald
Temple Law Solicitors
Mark McDonald has recently become a consultant with Temple Law solicitors. He has dealt with Telecommunication site issues over many years for both operators and landowners.
Mobile phone companies have in recent times largely stopped looking for new sites as they face greater competition between themselves and as the recession hits us all. What they are doing is consolidating their relations with each other and they are increasingly sharing each others’ capacities to cut costs.
They are however looking to put in enhanced equipment to service mobile broadband use, especially where they have decided to share sites to cut costs.
What this means for the landowner is that instead of a new site with disturbance payment and a solid rent, there is just a visit from a technical crew to add to or adjust equipment that is already in place.
The landowner should not however be complacent.
The original agreement will usually contain a number of limitations on the equipment that can be installed at any one time.
The limitations can affect the following matters:
1. The height of the mast
2. The maximum number of the antennae
3. The maximum number and the size of the microwave dishes
4. The particular mobile ’phone company using the equipment
If the operator has exceeded the limits in the original agreement it should renegotiate and pay a further fee or increase the rent.
The operator itself will probably have the original lease or agreement in storage and the technical department making any upgrade may not itself have all the details of what was originally agreed. They may go in and make changes that are not authorised in all good faith.
The consequence of this is that it is down to you the landowner to inspect, check and police the operation here.
It is a simple and cheap exercise to get your solicitor or even better a solicitor specialising in this area to set out the details. He or she would at the same time cheque that rent reviews have been properly carried out and that there are no other moneys owing to you. You would be surprised how many agreements are still at the original rent a decade after the original agreement was made.
Do this simple housekeeping exercise now and you could find a surprising bonus at no cost!
Mark McDonald
Temple Law Solicitors
Mark McDonald has recently become a consultant with Temple Law solicitors. He has dealt with Telecommunication site issues over many years for both operators and landowners.
No Comments
Nobody has posted any comments on this story.
|
Farming items for Sale
|
Used New Holland TS 110 4wd - York(GBP 13950)
JD 6520 - Pickering(GBP 21500)
Case IH MX310 - Norwich
(Price on Application)
(Price on Application)
Renault 95-12 - North Tiverton(GBP 3950)
Case MXM140 - Tiverton(GBP 20500)
Related News
Landowners advised to stand firm on telecoms contracts as Vodafone profits tumble - 31 May 2006Farmers and landowners with telecom mast sites have been warned that companies are reviewing their portfolios and are looking to decommission some rur...
Warning to landowners on mobile phone masts - 28 Aug 2008Landowners tempted to enjoy a windfall from allowing mobile phone masts be be erected on their property have been warned that the long-term disadvanta...
Landowners set to lose out as mobile phone masts decommissioned - 09 Oct 2009Rural landowners stand to lose almost £100 million in income as mobile phone companies begin a push to decommission more than 13,000 masts. Over th...
Landowners not required to keep herd registers for graziers’ cattle where CTS links are in place - 05 Sep 2006The responsibilities of landowners* and graziers on cattle identification and registration have been made much simpler. Landowners have no need to kee...
Total English coastal access is not achievable, concur landowners and ramblers - 12 Jun 2008Landowners and ramblers today both acknowledged that a complete coastal path will never be achieved around England. The two groups – traditional op...
DON'T be complacent with eyespot risk in winter wheat this season - 13 Apr 2004Picture: Don't be complacent with eyespot following the wet weather, warns Rod Burke of Syngenta. And remember the importance of controlling both...
Telecoms Revolution brings increased revenue for farming community - 24 May 2004Thanks to the telecoms revolution, the farming community can look forward to increased income from their property assets, in the view of chartered sur...
New Can-Am ATV riding gear range - 30 Jan 2007NEW CAN-AM ATV RIDING GEAR RANGE The new Can-Am(T) clothing range, designed especially for the ATV rider, is available from authorised Can-Am deale...
Pembrokehshire farmers meet local AM - 22 Nov 2007"Farmgate beef and lamb prices need to increase substantially to ensure the long term viability of livestock production in Pembrokeshire," Perkin Evan...
Telecoms news - T-Mobile & Hutchison 3G UK: An update - 18 Feb 2009For those landlords with T-Mobile or H3G (known as ’3’) telecom installations, many have now received letters requesting their consent to ...
