Mole Valley Farmers
Farminguk
01 October 2016 | Online since 2003
Less co2 Limited


14 January 2014 03:22:14 |Finance,News

Mixed partnerships should beware new tax rules


Farming partnerships that include a mix of individual members and companies or trustees should be aware of new anti-avoidance tax rules.

Draft legislation, which will form part the Finance Bill 2014, seeks to target tax-motivated arrangements involving mixed partnerships, warns accountant Old Mill. This could affect profit-sharing agreements whereby partners aim to minimise individual tax bills.

“Many farmers have a corporate structure which allows them to take advantage of lower tax rates,” says Anne Gardner-Thorpe, tax manager at Old Mill. “But where that company is also part of a partnership, businesses could find themselves with markedly higher tax bills.”

In many cases, individual partners have reduced their own income tax liability by diverting partnership profits to a non-individual partner – typically a company or trustee, which pays a lower rate of tax on its profit share, says Miss Gardner-Thorpe. “Broadly, this draft legislation seeks to override these profit sharing agreements, so that the profit allocated to the non-individual member is taxed on those individual partners who stand to benefit from the non-individual’s profit.”

For example, a farming partnership with a taxable profit of £40,000 is split equally between three individual partners and a company, solely held by the same individual partners. The company would usually pay tax at 20% on its profits, while higher rate individual taxpayers would pay tax at 40%. Under the new proposals, the profit share allocated to the company will be re-attributed to those shareholders who are also individual members of the partnership.

The draft legislation also tackles situations where profits allocated to a non-individual partner actually represent services that have been performed by a person who is not a partner, says Miss Gardner-Thorpe. “Where it would be reasonable to assume that the person would have been a partner but for the inclusion of the non-individual member, tax will be levied on the individual, not the corporate member.”

The second element of the legislation seeks to prevent individual partners from using partnership losses to reduce their personal tax liability through securing certain loss reliefs.

“Partnerships are traditionally the most common business structure for farming families, many of which also include a company partner,” says Miss Gardner-Thorpe. “Although the legislation is designed to catch tax-motivated arrangements, now is a good time to review any business structures that might be affected.”

The legislation is due to come into force from April, and will apply to profits generated from April 2014 – although the anti-avoidance measures have already come into effect, she adds. “That does not leave long to make alternative arrangements. It is imperative that farmers review their business structure now, to ensure it is suitable for their circumstances, and that it will not fall foul of the new legislation.”

Download

0 Comment

loginuserlogo
Name

Please enter your name


Email

Please enter your email

Please enter valid email


Comment

Please enter your comment


Post Comment

Your comment has been submitted successfully. Please wait for admin approval.


Comments

No comments posted yet. Be the first to post a comment


USA | 30 September 2016
Toolbox unveiled to help preserve agriculture in Utah County

Rex Larsen, a fifth-generation Utah County farmer, is facing issues that the previous generations didn’t have to worry about, namely, rapid urban development encroaching on farmland. His farm, he s...


China | 30 September 2016
Will big agriculture mergers impact smallholder farmers?

A tsunami-sized wave of corporate megamergers sweeping the agrochemical industry has the potential to reshape the landscape of global farming and food production. If approved, the multibillion doll...


USA | 30 September 2016
Morris farm works to rebound after beef recall

A Connecticut farm in the middle of a beef recall is giving refunds, and fighting to guarantee its reputation. Truelove Farms had one steer sent off to Adams Farm in Massachusetts in late July for ...


USA | 30 September 2016
Small dairy farm wins with robotic milking

Old English cheese recipes and high-tech production put Kenton County farmer on the menu. On a rainy day, Eddie Gibson sits outside his dairy barn near Walton looking out at his 130-acre farm. Surr...


Canada | 30 September 2016
Schumer continues push against harmful Canadian dairy rules

A push against Canadian protectionism harming O-AT-KA Milk and dairy entities has reached federa Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack. Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer said Wednesday that...



Trending Now

Viewed
Discussed


Top stories you may have missed
FarmingUK
FarmingUK Logo

FarmingUK

Farm subsidy payments funded by the UK taxpayer are being paid to millionai...


FarmingUK
FarmingUK Logo

FarmingUK

Labour will end the badger cull and prioritise ending bovine TB, Shadow Def...


FarmingUK
FarmingUK Logo

FarmingUK

A herd of rare White Park cattle could die out if its owners do not urgentl...


FarmingUK
FarmingUK Logo

FarmingUK

The UK government is "failing" to support farmers in the long-term accordin...


FarmingUK
FarmingUK Logo

FarmingUK

Retailer Co-op has announced that from May 2017 all of its bacon and lamb w...


FarmingUK
FarmingUK Logo

FarmingUK

Over 50 wildlife organisations have compiled a stock-take of all the UK's n...


FarmingUK
FarmingUK Logo

FarmingUK

In the run up to the EU farm ministers meeting the agricultural sector have...


FarmingUK
FarmingUK Logo

FarmingUK

The RPA must iron out a number of problems that still exist with 2015 BPS p...


FarmingUK
FarmingUK Logo

FarmingUK

Tourism businesses in the countryside are being held back due to the uncert...


FarmingUK
FarmingUK Logo

FarmingUK

A 24 point action plan aimed at revitalising Scotland's sheep sector after ...


closeicon
Username
Password