Return National Park planning to local councils, says FUW
The Farmers' Union of Wales debated the issue at their recent quarterly Grand Council meeting in Aberystwyth attended by delegates from counties throughout Wales.
A resolution from the union's Brecon and Radnor county branch, proposed by FUW life member and former deputy national president Glyn Powell, stressed that returning planning responsibilities to local councils would be a first step towards abolishing Wales’ three National Park authorities.
The resolution, which was overwhelmingly carried, pointed out that National Parks have "little economic development responsibilities and as such should not be delivering planning policies".
Delegates agreed that "with huge proposed cuts in public spending in Wales it is seen as a waste of taxpayers’ money to have three extra planning departments specifically for the three National Parks".
Referring to the Brecon Beacons National Park Authority, Mr Powell, of Sennybridge, near Brecon, told delegates: "People are always on my back about this subject and the bone of contention is the future of the National Park planning authorities, the unfairness of the current system and the inconsistencies of the activities of the Park with regard to planning.
"There are councillors on the authority but we don't choose them, the council does, and the Assembly chooses others. I don't think they understand the traditions of rural Wales.
"The Brecon Beacons National Park stretches over parts of seven counties. Common sense would tell you that it would be better if those counties took responsibility for their own planning responsibilities.
"The majority of people in Breconshire are not happy because they think they are represented by people who don't understand. The core of my argument is fairness.”
I am also staggered at the ignorance of people. Planning is a statutory requirement and has to be dealt with as such - it is not made up as you go along. Just poll some of the Farmers and find out how many of their families are working for tourism outlets - who facilitated this - oh yes the National Park. Be careful what you wish for!!!!
Don't ever make the mistake of thinking that creating a tourist destination can only be done by designating it a national park. Also be under no illusion what has created the landscapes yr tourists flock to. Human endeavour, firstly existence, then subsistence, then livelihoods carved out your 'natural' landscape.
Parks officers frequently deny businesses (farming included) the right to evolve. They're intoxicated with the idea they're policing a wilderness like Yellowstone. They're not. They're overseeing a green developed land. It's insulting and it's wrong.
Please enter your name
Please enter your comment
Your comment submitted successfully.Please wait for admin approval.
Some error on your process.Please try one more time.
Membership of the EU is damaging the British farming industry, according to...
BASIS has launched an accreditation for pilots of Unmanned Aerial Systems (...
UK wheat yields have theoretical potential to more than double over the nex...
Britain’s farmers flocked to Peterborough for the first day of LAMMA’15 to ...
The crisis in the dairy industry is not the fault of supermarkets, accordin...
Transport Minister Baroness Kramer visited three rural businesses in Cheshi...
Spearheading the John Deere range of mid-size tractors from Mannheim, the n...
Regular testing for bovine TB could significantly reduce the number of infe...
Single-issue policy-making threatens to hamper, not help, the progress of U...