Rural fast-track planning court 'threatens local democracy'
Campaign to Protect Rural England said the reports suggest the new measures will mean only those with a financial interest in a case can bring a challenge, which would put an end to challenges by individuals and campaigners acting in the public interest.
Ministers claim the reforms will lower the burden on courts, but only 1.5% of judicial review applications were related to planning cases, less than 200.
CPRE welcomes more planning expertise in the courts, as well as quicker procedures, but these should not come at the expense of local communities losing the right to challenge bad decisions.
CPRE’s Chief Executive, Shaun Spiers, said: "Judicial review is a crucial democratic safeguard against abuses of power or process. In planning, it is used by communities and campaigning groups with great reluctance and as a last resort. It is costly, time-consuming and stressful – but often the only way to get justice by getting bad developments dropped or at least significantly improved.
"When CPRE and people like us seek to challenge bad decisions - and we do so only very rarely - it is so that we can protect the countryside for future generations, not because of some financial interest.
"The Government should think again about reforms that would limit the right to challenge developers and landowners, and recognise that the public interest can be as important as any sectional financial interests. If the Government removes safeguards for local groups to have their costs limited, developers could win every time.
"This is an interesting curtain raiser to next year’s 800th anniversary of Magna Carta, the Great Charter of the Liberties of England. I dread to think what other celebrations the Government has in store."
What he didn't know was that most of them live in the UK. And they choose to live in rural areas.
Other common characteristics are that they don't fill other people's pay packets and their annual culmulative gross product wouldn't fill a Transit van.
Any farmer submitting a planning application for a dairy, poultry or pig buildings will gamble a substantial planning fee and have his enthusiasm and commitment undermined by the lengthy and inconsistent planning process. Instead we make a present of our industries to our fellow members of the EC and export our jobs: then we import their products and widen the trade gap.
Please enter your name
Please enter your comment
Your comment submitted successfully.Please wait for admin approval.
Some error on your process.Please try one more time.
Membership of the EU is damaging the British farming industry, according to...
BASIS has launched an accreditation for pilots of Unmanned Aerial Systems (...
UK wheat yields have theoretical potential to more than double over the nex...
Britain’s farmers flocked to Peterborough for the first day of LAMMA’15 to ...
The crisis in the dairy industry is not the fault of supermarkets, accordin...
Transport Minister Baroness Kramer visited three rural businesses in Cheshi...
Spearheading the John Deere range of mid-size tractors from Mannheim, the n...
Regular testing for bovine TB could significantly reduce the number of infe...
Single-issue policy-making threatens to hamper, not help, the progress of U...