Saturday 04 February 2012
Headlines
Did you find this story interesting? (0) (0)
08/02/2010 15:18:41
Science dictating policies on red meat issues must be incorruptible
The National Beef Association has warned international and national government food policy specialists, they must not to be tricked into making flawed decisions on the future of the red meat industry as a result of being misled by flawed science funded by well placed, anti-meat, agitators.
It says policy makers must be aware that livestock and meat production is regularly targeted by influential, and well-funded, vegetarian groups determined to further their cause – and that the funding of unsafe scientific reports is one of their most useful weapons.
"Cash accumulated by campaigning vegetarians is regularly used to attack meat production and tactics very often concentrate on undermining consumer confidence by linking meat eating with fear of disease, like cancer, or generating misplaced concern over the role farmed livestock might play in accelerating climate change," explained NBA director, Kim Haywood.
"And in this context the Association is worried that apparently plausible scientific contentions advanced as a result of cash paid out by determined anti-livestock farming lobbyists may undermine the integrity of crucial decisions taken by food policy specialists acting at national, EU, and international level."
One example is the failure of the World Cancer Research Fund to immediately acknowledge that a number of, apparently tactical, errors and omissions in its 2007 report have helped to support its case that a link exists between colorectal cancer and meat consumption – even though independent peer review has concluded there is no conclusive evidence of a causal relationship.
Another is the determination to continue to link ruminant animals with accelerating climate change even though the argument that animals eating grass are carbon neutral continues to gain increased scientific acceptance.
"The red meat industry has every reason to be alarmed about the presentation of bad science and the preaching of its flawed conclusions by anti-meat interests," said Ms Haywood.
"And it would be truly worrying if governments, and their advisors, allowed themselves to be influenced by unsound science because they were unaware of mounting evidence that vegetarian bias on red meat issues is corrupting basic scientific principles".
"The UK government has often said that science, not argument and counter-argument by self-interested lobby groups, must guide its decision making but if that is to be the case it must also be sure that the science it uses, on issues like bowel cancer, or greenhouse gas emissions by grazing livestock, is incorruptible."
It says policy makers must be aware that livestock and meat production is regularly targeted by influential, and well-funded, vegetarian groups determined to further their cause – and that the funding of unsafe scientific reports is one of their most useful weapons.
"Cash accumulated by campaigning vegetarians is regularly used to attack meat production and tactics very often concentrate on undermining consumer confidence by linking meat eating with fear of disease, like cancer, or generating misplaced concern over the role farmed livestock might play in accelerating climate change," explained NBA director, Kim Haywood.
"And in this context the Association is worried that apparently plausible scientific contentions advanced as a result of cash paid out by determined anti-livestock farming lobbyists may undermine the integrity of crucial decisions taken by food policy specialists acting at national, EU, and international level."
One example is the failure of the World Cancer Research Fund to immediately acknowledge that a number of, apparently tactical, errors and omissions in its 2007 report have helped to support its case that a link exists between colorectal cancer and meat consumption – even though independent peer review has concluded there is no conclusive evidence of a causal relationship.
Another is the determination to continue to link ruminant animals with accelerating climate change even though the argument that animals eating grass are carbon neutral continues to gain increased scientific acceptance.
"The red meat industry has every reason to be alarmed about the presentation of bad science and the preaching of its flawed conclusions by anti-meat interests," said Ms Haywood.
"And it would be truly worrying if governments, and their advisors, allowed themselves to be influenced by unsound science because they were unaware of mounting evidence that vegetarian bias on red meat issues is corrupting basic scientific principles".
"The UK government has often said that science, not argument and counter-argument by self-interested lobby groups, must guide its decision making but if that is to be the case it must also be sure that the science it uses, on issues like bowel cancer, or greenhouse gas emissions by grazing livestock, is incorruptible."
User Comments
|
Farming items for Sale
|
Massey Ferguson 6485 - Maidstone(GBP 30900)
Case cs75 4wd, Chiltern loader - Telford(GBP 15450)
John Deere - 4755 TRACTOR - NORWICH(GBP 14000)
John Deere 6420S - Maidstone(GBP 21600)
David Brown 1390 - Tiverton(GBP 4750)
Related News
EU agriculture needs science-based policies to tackle food security and climate change threat - 23 Sep 2009The urgent need for science-based decision-making at an EU level was the central theme of a major debate on the importance of pesticides in tackling t...
New business to tackle issues over red diesel following legislative changes - 08 Aug 2011A County Durham business has been launched, to help users of red diesel keep their machinery in good order. Ian Currie of Fuel Guard, which is based a...
Mixed response to HMRC review of policy on red diesel - 20 Dec 2011The NFU is backing a proposed relaxation in the rules on the use of red diesel to allow farmers to grit roads during severe wintry weather. The Gov...
'Market should dictate change' says British Retail Consortium - 05 Jan 2010Government food policy should recognise that the market delivers change more effectively than politicians ever can. Reacting to the Government&rsq...
Drilling dictates field-by-field decision making - 26 Oct 2010Spraying at short notice and on a field-by-field basis will be the best way to complete black-grass control programmes this autumn, says Bayer CropSci...
New Can-Am ATV riding gear range - 30 Jan 2007NEW CAN-AM ATV RIDING GEAR RANGE The new Can-Am(T) clothing range, designed especially for the ATV rider, is available from authorised Can-Am deale...
Absolute Disgust at Dolgellau Store’s Meat Policy - 07 Jun 2007NFU Cymru is absolutely disgusted that the Somerfield store in Dolgellau is stocking imported lamb and beef on its shelves. Brazilian beef and New Zea...
Pembrokehshire farmers meet local AM - 22 Nov 2007"Farmgate beef and lamb prices need to increase substantially to ensure the long term viability of livestock production in Pembrokeshire," Perkin Evan...
FUW welcomes AM's report on Glastir - 03 Mar 2010The Farmers’ Union of Wales today welcomed the conclusions of the Assembly’s rural development sub-committee’s inquiry into the new ...
FUW members tell AM of TB cull delay worries - 15 Sep 2011Farmers’ Union of Wales members in Carmarthenshire expressed their concerns at the Welsh Government’s failure to drive the bovine TB eradi...
"vegetarian groups determined to further their cause"...
Posted By Anonymous At 09/02/2010 05:33:37You know the meat industry is motivated by money making... What in the world "motivates" vegetarians or vegan??? Survival perhaps?
It is the meat industry that is evermore determined to warp the facts and buy off politicians so that they may continue bilking the profit$.