Shotguns will be allowed in badger culls
Humane Society International/UK’s executive director, veterinarian Mark Jones, said: “I’m appalled that DEFRA is arrogantly ignoring the clear advice of the British Veterinary Association on the basis of the Independent Expert Panel’s findings, by allowing badgers to be killed with shotguns this summer despite the fact that there is no evidence at all to show this is humane. As a vet I fear that targeting a moving animal in the dark by spraying it with shotgun pellets will vastly increase the chance of non-lethal injuries and prolonged suffering. In allowing shooters to continue using shotguns, DEFRA and Natural England are showing a blatant disregard for badger welfare.
“This news comes just days after the most recent figures from Wales showing the lowest number of cattle slaughtered due to bovine TB for a single month in March since 2008, and ever-decreasing new herd outbreaks. Whilst Wales calmly gets on with tackling this disease using sensible, science-led measures, in England DEFRA’s ineffective, inhumane and unnecessary massacre of badgers is set to continue without even modest concessions to welfare. If DEFRA is prepared to ignore both the BVA and the IEP on this important issue, what else will it ignore? I’m concerned this could represent the thin end of the wedge, as DEFRA continues to simply cast aside any unfavourable expert and scientific opinion in pursuit of a badger cull at any cost.”
The IEP’s report stated that shotguns should only be considered if their use is to be rigorously monitored. However, DEFRA has repeatedly confirmed that the IEP will not be reconvened this year and that cull contractors will only be monitored by Natural England for license and best-practice compliance. HSI UK believes that adherence to best practice guidelines in no way guarantees animal welfare and does not constitute the ‘rigour’ the IEP called for.
Stupidly DEFRA's giving the shooters carte blanche to perform EVEN WORSE than they have already and to increase the animal suffering they've caused.
It's already been proved that Natural England isn't up to the job of controlling the culling companies or the shooters; it's entirely wrong to put them in charge again. As is clear from the Independent Experts Panel report, the shooters and culling companies ignored Natural England's licencing conditions much of the time. When free shooting, the shooters shot MOST of the badgers they killed in different parts of the body to that specified by Natural England (on welfare grounds). Essential documentation needed by Natural England to monitor individual shooters wasn't completed or was so faulty Natural England couldn't use it. Shooters didn't comply with Natural England's key health and safety requirements, putting the public at risk of being shot and contaminating land and vehicles with potentially hazardous badger "waste". It's been reported that unauthorised, untrained shooters were (illegally) brought in during the later stages of the cull to replace the many shooters who left when they couldn't make badger killing pay.
Please enter your name
Please enter your comment
Your comment submitted successfully.Please wait for admin approval.
Some error on your process.Please try one more time.
GM crops are good for the economy and can reduce the amount of pesticides u...
Demand from smaller European markets has helped drive strong growth for UK ...
A lack of engineers, not enough people promoting the land-based industries ...
Environment Secretary Elizabeth Truss is launching the National Pollinator ...
Agricultural specialists have welcomed a potential financial boost for youn...
As retailers continue to participate in a highly competitive race to the bo...
New farm business income data from Defra, which focus on income from March ...
Agriculture has remained one of the industries in which workers are most li...
Prime arable land in the UK has seen a substantial year-on-year growth in p...