Sunday 27 May 2012
Headlines
Did you find this story interesting? (0) (0)
27/06/2003
Soil Association welcomes CAP reforms
In response to the CAP reforms, Phil Stocker, Head of Agriculture at the Soil Association said:
"The proposed reforms are welcome and represent the only way to break the cycle of agriculture crises. Many of these changes will encourage farmers to switch to less intensive methods.
"Organic farming delivers many of the environmental and social benefits that the changes intend to stimulate, yet under the current CAP framework organic farmers are disadvantaged, with some receiving a third less in subsidies than other farmers.
"We urge Defra to take up the 100% decoupling option whilst ensuring that this does not lead to unfair competition from countries that do not introduce single payments.The option to retain certain premium payments will not benefit organic farmers and may encourage some parts of the farming industry to continue to overstock."
The Soil Association made the following comments about specific proposals:
· The single payment may disadvantage existing organic farmers, as it is based on the amount of subsidies historically received. We have asked Defra to give organic farmers the option to claim for the period 1997-1999 when many were still farming conventionally and as a result received higher levels of subsidies. Farmers who were fully organic before 1997 should be paid 45% above the historic level. Using this system would ensure better equity between existing organic farmers and those who choose to convert after CAP reform with relatively high single farm payments
· Growers producing fruit, vegetables and potatoes again miss out. The reform process could have provided an opportunity to provide support payments in terms of single farm payments to these sectors, and a re allocation of funds to encompass this sector would have had little impact on the arable and livestock sectors.
· Continued modulation – which allows a percentage of farm subsidies to be paid back into an EU-wide fund for rural development – is welcomed. The UK currently pays a higher rate of modulation than most other EU countries (3.5%), 80% of which can now be used on domestic schemes. We agree that farmers receiving less than 5,000 Euros should be exempt from modulation.
· The requirement to keep land under 'good agricultural conditions' has been changed to keeping land under 'good agricultural and environmental conditions'. Though this would appear to be an improvement, the benefit of this term will only be seen when a full definition is given. Whilst the concept of decoupling support from production is right, support payments should not be completely divorced from the production of food. The definition could be expanded to require a level of quality agricultural output that delivers environmental, animal welfare and social benefits.
· The option for member states to divert up to 10% of direct aids into a national envelope is welcome, as is the national reserve to deal with special cases, such as new entrants to farming.
· We welcomed the proposed 10-year non-rotational set aside option for non-organic land, which would allow biodiversity to develop on unfarmed land. However, this proposal appears to have been dropped, and rotational set aside is unlikely to provide equivalent environmental benefits. For the last two seasons, farmers whose whole holdings are organic have been allowed to graze livestock and produce crops on set a side land whilst still receiving set aside payments. It is important that this concession is expanded to holdings with organic and non-organic units.
· The requirement for permanent pasture to remain as permanent pasture has been relaxed. We will continue to lobby for an environmental assessment to be made before land that has been under grass for 12 years or more is ploughed up.
"The proposed reforms are welcome and represent the only way to break the cycle of agriculture crises. Many of these changes will encourage farmers to switch to less intensive methods.
"Organic farming delivers many of the environmental and social benefits that the changes intend to stimulate, yet under the current CAP framework organic farmers are disadvantaged, with some receiving a third less in subsidies than other farmers.
"We urge Defra to take up the 100% decoupling option whilst ensuring that this does not lead to unfair competition from countries that do not introduce single payments.The option to retain certain premium payments will not benefit organic farmers and may encourage some parts of the farming industry to continue to overstock."
The Soil Association made the following comments about specific proposals:
· The single payment may disadvantage existing organic farmers, as it is based on the amount of subsidies historically received. We have asked Defra to give organic farmers the option to claim for the period 1997-1999 when many were still farming conventionally and as a result received higher levels of subsidies. Farmers who were fully organic before 1997 should be paid 45% above the historic level. Using this system would ensure better equity between existing organic farmers and those who choose to convert after CAP reform with relatively high single farm payments
· Growers producing fruit, vegetables and potatoes again miss out. The reform process could have provided an opportunity to provide support payments in terms of single farm payments to these sectors, and a re allocation of funds to encompass this sector would have had little impact on the arable and livestock sectors.
· Continued modulation – which allows a percentage of farm subsidies to be paid back into an EU-wide fund for rural development – is welcomed. The UK currently pays a higher rate of modulation than most other EU countries (3.5%), 80% of which can now be used on domestic schemes. We agree that farmers receiving less than 5,000 Euros should be exempt from modulation.
· The requirement to keep land under 'good agricultural conditions' has been changed to keeping land under 'good agricultural and environmental conditions'. Though this would appear to be an improvement, the benefit of this term will only be seen when a full definition is given. Whilst the concept of decoupling support from production is right, support payments should not be completely divorced from the production of food. The definition could be expanded to require a level of quality agricultural output that delivers environmental, animal welfare and social benefits.
· The option for member states to divert up to 10% of direct aids into a national envelope is welcome, as is the national reserve to deal with special cases, such as new entrants to farming.
· We welcomed the proposed 10-year non-rotational set aside option for non-organic land, which would allow biodiversity to develop on unfarmed land. However, this proposal appears to have been dropped, and rotational set aside is unlikely to provide equivalent environmental benefits. For the last two seasons, farmers whose whole holdings are organic have been allowed to graze livestock and produce crops on set a side land whilst still receiving set aside payments. It is important that this concession is expanded to holdings with organic and non-organic units.
· The requirement for permanent pasture to remain as permanent pasture has been relaxed. We will continue to lobby for an environmental assessment to be made before land that has been under grass for 12 years or more is ploughed up.
No Comments
Nobody has posted any comments on this story.
|
Farming items for Sale
|
Deutz Agrofarm 100 - Stirling(GBP 31800)
Massey Ferguson 3630 - York
(Price on Application)
(Price on Application)
Case 155 puma - Chippenham(GBP 62400)
Massey Ferguson 6170 Dynashift - Tiverton(GBP 11500)
John Deere - 6830 - Byfield
(Price on Application)
(Price on Application)
Related News
National Beef Association calls for sweeping CAP reforms - 11 Jan 2010The National Beef Association has called for a radical new approach to CAP reform, with its massive amount of red tape and the absorption of a huge pr...
The Tenant Farmers Association seven golden principles for CAP reform - 12 Apr 2010The Tenant Farmers Association’s National Chairman Greg Bliss has identified seven golden principles that must underpin the next reform of the C...
Soil Association welcomes new ministerial appointments - 19 Jun 2003The Soil Association has welcomed the appointment of Elliot Morley as environment minister, who will have responsibility for GM, and Ben Bradshaw whos...
Soil Association welcomes new payments for organic farmers - 05 Jun 2003In response to the introduction of new payments for organic farmers in England, Peter Melchett, the Soil Association's policy director said: "The ...
Soil Association welcomes Defra’s decision on bluetongue vaccination - 02 Nov 2007The Soil Association welcomes Defra's announcement to issue a tender for a bluetongue vaccine bank. Phil Stocker, head of food and farming, sa...
NFU Cymru welcomes CAP reform proposals - 18 Jan 2011Rural Affairs Minister’s initial Views on the European Commission proposals for reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) have been welcome...
NFU welcomes CAP reform report - 02 Feb 2012NFU Cymru has welcomed the key findings and recommendations of the National Assembly’s Environment & Sustainability Committee’s Task and F...
Common ground welcomed on CAP reforms - 23 May 2012The NFU has today said that the views of Welsh Government are currently broadly in line with those of the farming industry in Wales, following the Wel...
Soil Association backs Meacher's stance on GM crops - 23 Jun 2003The Soil Association has backed former environment minister Michael Meacher's outspoken criticism of the government's position GM food, in yes...
Soil Association says burial ban on stock is unjustified - 08 Aug 2003New regulations governing the disposal of fallen stock are scientifically unjustified, according to the Soil Association, which is calling for burial ...
