Dairy farmer ordered to pay £7000 after polluting stream

The pipe allowed diluted slurry, chopped straw, animal feed and soil sediment to enter the stream (Photo: Environment Agency)
The pipe allowed diluted slurry, chopped straw, animal feed and soil sediment to enter the stream (Photo: Environment Agency)

A dairy farmer has been ordered to pay over £7000 after being found guilty of allowing slurry to pollute a watercourse.

Peter Joules, who farms at Bircholt Farm near Ashford, Kent, has been ordered to pay £1,500 plus £5,516 in victim charges and costs by Maidstone Magistrates’ Court.

The Environment Agency brought the charges against Mr Joules after its officers discovered a spill of neat slurry from an overflowing slurry lagoon that reached the stream.

The officers then found that there had been a longer spill of dilute slurry and dirty water from livestock gathering areas that was also polluting the watercourse, via an underground pipe.

In March 2017, officers were inspecting a tributary of the Aylesford Brook when they discovered slurry running into the stream, and traced it back to the slurry lagoon at Bircholt Farm.

They then discovered a black pipe discharging a brown liquid around 200 metres further upstream. The pipe was part of farmyard drainage system that discharged rainwater and yard washings.

The pipe allowed diluted slurry, chopped straw, animal feed and soil sediment to enter the stream.

Officers took samples from the stream and found the water quality was heavily impacted by the two discharges.

The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) sets limits for what is considered ‘good’ water quality. The WFD levels for biological oxygen demand are 4.0mg/l, yet those found in the sample were 463mg/l; 115 times the limit. For orthophosphate, the level is 0.12mg/l, but the sample returned 15.2 mg/l; 126 times above the limit.

An Environment Agency spokesperson said: “Good farm management is vital to avoid incidents like this that damage the local aquatic environment and harm wildlife.

“We take these incidents very seriously and do everything within our powers to safeguard the environment and people that may be affected. Mr Joules’ farm didn’t have the infrastructure to deal with the slurry it produces, which caused a serious pollution incident. In these circumstances we do not hesitate to prosecute.“

The incident follows a similar case where a farmer was ordered to pay nearly £4,000 after polluting a steam with liquid fertiliser, killing about 2,000 fish.