Grower feedback wanted on changes to seed potato standards

The standards promote best practice in key areas of seed production
The standards promote best practice in key areas of seed production

British seed growers are being asked to share their feedback on potential changes to the scope of the Safe Haven Standards, the seed potato assurance scheme run by Red Tractor.

The standards promote best practice in key areas of seed production to protect the industry against incursions of bacterial ring rot or Dickeya.

The review will consider whether the current standards are fit for purpose, as well as identifying potential new areas to bring into the scheme.

Seed growers will be able to share their views on the standards using an online questionnaire from the 7 December to 7 February.

The Safe Haven Standards were initially introduced after a ring rot outbreak in England and Wales in 2003 from seed sourced from the Netherlands.

The scheme was later widened to include Dickeya and has been largely successful at protecting British seed stocks from these diseases with 60% of growers certified (by area) under the Safe Haven Standards.

Vicky Smith, Technical Manager for Red Tractor said: “With Brexit approaching and with it potential changes to our trading relationships this seemed the ideal time to consider the current remit of the Safe Haven scheme and whether we can strengthen it further, both in terms of the protection if offers from diseases, but also in enhancing the reputation of British seed.”

AHDB Head of Crop Trade Market Development, Rob Burns, said that over the years the scheme’s value has increased in the eyes of potential customers.

He says: “In my role I travel widely working with foreign countries to open new markets for seed potatoes and many of the nations we deal with have a lot of respect for the Safe Haven Standards and the protection it brings.

“However, we are often asked about whether the scheme covers other diseases, such as silver scurf or black dot, or even more exotic pests and diseases like epitrix or zebra chip.

“For some potential trading relationships, a broader scheme could be even more attractive, which is why I think the review is important, and that growers should engage with it.”

Mr Burns added: “There was a first round of productive discussions at the recent Seed Industry Event in St Andrews where some felt that concentrating on core attributes of the current scheme was the priority whereas some could see a benefit in extending the range of pests and pathogens covered.”

Growers can contribute their views until the questionnaire closing date of 7 February. The new scheme will then go out for an official industry consultation in the autumn of 2019.