(Photo: Red Tractor)
Red Tractor has criticised an Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruling against one of its adverts, describing the decision as âfundamentally flawedâ and warning it could have wider implications for food and farming campaigns.
The ruling relates to a television advert first broadcast in 2021, which focused on Red Tractorâs standards for traceability, food safety and animal welfare.
The complaint, lodged by environmental charity River Action in 2023, alleged the campaign misled consumers by implying environmental standards were covered and described the advert as âgreenwashingâ.
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruled that the assurance scheme had failed to provide sufficient evidence of compliance with environmental rules to substantiate its claims.
Red Tractor said the claim was based on a misinterpretation of Environment Agency data. The regulatorâs then head of agriculture, Kevin Austin, had confirmed the data had been misunderstood at the time, according to the assurance body.
Chief executive Jim Moseley said the ASA had taken more than two years to reach its final position. âThe ASA has been considering this complaint for over two years, during which time theyâve flipped from not upholding to upholding,â he said.
âWe believe the ASAâs final decision is fundamentally flawed and misinterprets the content of our advert. If the advert was clearly misleading, it wouldnât have taken so long to reach this conclusion.â
Although the complaint was upheld, the ASAâs action was limited. Red Tractor may continue to use the phrase âfarmed with careâ, but future ads must include a reference to where consumers can find more information about the specific standards involved.
Moseley added that the decision raises serious concerns. âRather than use the accepted âaverage consumer testâ, the ASA has used their own judgement that a minority of informed consumers may misinterpret the advert. We believe this is an error in law and certainly a departure from normal practice.â
He also criticised the ASAâs treatment of pastoral imagery as an implicit environmental claim, warning this âcould have serious implications for other advertisers, particularly in the field of food and farming.â
River Action is now warning major supermarkets that, in its view, by using Red Tractor to reassure customers they risk complicity in misleading advertising, while pollution of the UKâs rivers continues.